References

Adams, D. D., & Shrum, J. W. (1990). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students. *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27,* 777-787.

American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (1995). *Crossroads in Mathematics: Standards of Introductory College Mathematics Before Calculus.* Memphis, Tennessee: American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges.

Barclay, W. L. (1985). *Graphing Misconceptions and Possible Remedies Using Microcomputer-Based Labs. * (Technical Report Number TERC-TR-85-5). Cambridge, MA: Technical Education Research Center.

Beckmann, C. E. (1988). Effect of computer graphics use on student understanding of calculus concepts. (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1988). *Dissertation Abstracts International, 50*, 1974B.

Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27,* 803-815.

Berg, C. A., & Phillips, D. G. (1994). An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs. *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31,* 323-344.

Brasell, H. (1987a). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24,* 385-395.

Brasell, H. (1987b, April). *The role of microcomputer-based laboratories in learning to make graphs of distance and velocity.* Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.

Brasell, H. (1987c, April). *Sex differences related to graphing skills in microcomputer-based labs.* Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.

Brown, D., Porta, H. A., & Uhl, J. J. (1990a). Calculus&Mathematica: Courseware for the nineties. *The* *Mathematica Journal, 1* (1), 43-50.

Brown, D., Porta, H. A., & Uhl, J. J. (1990b). University of Illinois: Calculus and Mathematica. In T. W. Tucker (Ed.), *Priming the calculus pump: Innovations and resources* (pp. 101-120). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Brown, D., Porta, H. A., & Uhl, J. J. (1991a). Calculus and Mathematica: A laboratory course for learning by doing. In L. C. Leinbach (Ed.), *The laboratory approach to teaching calculus* (pp. 99-110). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Clement, J., Mokros, J. R., & Schultz, K. (1985). *Adolescents’ Graphing Skills: A Descriptive Analysis.* (Technical report number TERC-TR-85-1). Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center.

Graves, E. & Lopez, R. J. (1991). Local and global explorations in calculus using computer algebra. In L. C. Leinbach (Ed.), *The laboratory approach to teaching calculus* (pp. 143-147). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Heid, M. K. (1984). An exploratory study to examine the effects of resequencing skills and concepts in an applied calculus curriculum through the use of the microcomputer. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1984). *Dissertation Abstracts International, 46*, 1548A.

Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19* (1), 3-25.

Linn, M. C., Layman, J. W., & Nachmias, R. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. *Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12,* 244-253.

McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. *American Journal of Physics, 55,* 503-513.

McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the Test of Graphing in Science (TOGS). *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23,* 571-579.

Mokros, J. R. (1985). *The Impact of Microcomputer-Based Science Labs on Children’s Graphing Skills.* (Technical Report Number TERC-TR-85-3). Cambridge, MA: Technical Education Research Center.

Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The Impact of Microcomputer-Based Labs on Children’s Ability to Interpret Graphs. *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24,* 369-383.

Muller, E. R. (1991). MAPLE laboratory in a service calculus course. In L. C. Leinbach (Ed.), *The laboratory approach to teaching calculus* (pp. 111-117). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Murphy, L. D. (1997). *Computer Algebra Systems in Calculus Reform.* Available at <http://www.mste.uiuc.edu/murphy/papers/CalcReformPaper.html>.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). *Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics.* Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

National Research Council (1989). *Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education.* Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ostebee, A. & Zorn, P. (1990). St. Olaf College: Viewing calculus from graphical and numerical perspectives. In T. W. Tucker (Ed.), *Priming the calculus pump: Innovations and resources* (pp. 199-222). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Park, K. (1993). A comparative study of the traditional calculus course vs. the Calculus & Mathematica course. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1993).

Porzio, D. T. (1994). The effects of differing technological approaches to calculus on students' use and understanding of multiple representations when solving problems. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1994).

Small, D. B. (1991). Calculus reform -- Laboratories -- CAS's. In L. C. Leinbach (Ed.), *The laboratory approach to teaching calculus* (pp. 9-13). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Sosniak, L. A., Ethington , C. A., & Varelas, M. (1994). The myth of progressive and traditional orientations: Teaching mathematics without a coherent point of view. In I. Westbury, C. A. Ethington, L. A. Sosniak, & D. P. Baker (Eds.), In Search of a More Effective Mathematics Education: Examining Data from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study (pp. 95-112). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Company.

Svec, M. T. (1995, April). *Effect of Micro-Computer Based Laboratory on Graphing Interpretation Skills and Understanding of Motion.* Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

Thornton, R. K. (1985). *Tools for scientific thinking: Microcomputer-based laboratories for the naive science learner.* (Technical Report Number TERC-TR-85-6). Cambridge, MA: Technical Education Research Center.

Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. *American Journal of Physics, 58,* 858-867.

Back to the Table of Contents for this paper.

Back to Lisa's Papers page.

Back to Lisa's Academic Activities page.

Back to Lisa's personal home page, Over the Rainbow.

This page last revised January 18, 2000